Ponder Med

Trying to make sense of Emergency Medicine. A UK trainee's perspective.

  • Home
  • About
  • EMJ Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Performance
  • Cases
  • Airway
  • Cardiology
  • Paeds
  • Trauma
  • FRCEM Exams
You are here: Home / Pondering Airway / Assessing Airways in the ED

Assessing Airways in the ED

January 25, 2017 By Andrew Wilkinson 3 Comments

2414534443_84c035698bI’m an anaesthetic registrar in North East London (@andrewwilko1986). On a daily basis I perform airway assessments. Although not a classic medical school patient examination, it’s an extremely important process. Fortunately it’s very simple, and in this blog I’d like to highlight why it’s important, and some concepts to think about when dealing with a patient that might require a definitive airway in the ED.

Why?

One main reason is NAP41. If you’re scratching your head and wondering what NAP4 is then you’re in luck and have the delight of reading it for the very first time after this blog. And PLEASE do, you won’t regret it. It’s a phenomenal audit project investigating the nature of airway management complications across the UK, both in and out of theatre. One of their major conclusions was that ‘poor airway assessment contributes to poor airway outcomes’ and ‘failure to assess the airway is a failure in professional duty’.

The familiar adage ‘failure to prepare is preparing to fail’ couldn’t be more poignant than with the acutely unwell patient that requires intubation.

Now I know that emergency medicine (EM) rapid sequence intubation (RSI) is a hot topic for debate but I want to focus on the step before this that I believe is more important than the person wielding the laryngoscope blade. After all, you can teach a monkey to put a correctly shaped block through a hole.. and presumably put an endotracheal tube into the trachea. Point being: it’s not a difficult psychomotor skill to master.

We know that the incidence of difficult intubation (grade 3 or 4 view) in the ED is up to 7 fold greater than for elective surgical cases, with the percentage of difficult intubations quoted at 8.5% in a large multi-centre prospective study of urban EDs in Scotland2. I’m fully aware that there are significant confounding factors with these figures this but it reinforces the importance of a quality airway assessment allowing us to prepare appropriately.

In ED, when you have a patient requiring an RSI, before you get caught up with the type and dose of induction agent, size of endotracheal tube and laryngoscope blade, DON’T forget the airway assessment!

To assess a patient’s airway we need to have an organised, structured approach and be aware of features that worry us.

The assessment

Like any patient assessment it can be neatly divided into history, examination and investigations. In the ED, I can appreciate that history and investigations are not always available, but that’s OK because the crucial component of an airway assessment is the physical examination. Virtually all of the information is gained visually.

It is made up of multiple single assessments:

  1. Mallampati score (I,II,III,IV)
  2. Mouth opening (>3cm is good)
  3. Thyromental distance (>6.5cm is good)
  4. Dentition
  5. Mandibular protrusion/upper lip bite test
  6. Neck movements

A well described assessment is the Mallampati score (see appendix below) which is simple to perform. However, a large meta-analysis demonstrated ‘only 35% of patients with a difficult intubation were identified as Mallampati III or IV’4. Similarly poor sensitivity/specificity is seen in all single assessments if performed in isolation. So what we must do is utilise an amalgamation of these single tests.

Grouped assessments (see appendix):

  1. WILSON’s score (5 parameters – weight, neck movement, jaw movement, receding mandible, buck teeth)
  2. LEMON (Look, Evaluate, Mallampati, Obstruction, Neck movements)

I personally like to break the airway assessment down into what will be difficult for the given patient;

  1. Difficult BVM = ‘BONES’ – Beard, Obese, No teeth, Elderly, Sleep apnoea
  2. Difficult larngoscopy = Mouth opening < 3cm or unable to put 3 fingers between inscisors.
  3. Difficult larnygeal view = Inability to align the 3 axis of the airway, see below.
  4. Difficult surgical airway = ‘SHORT’ – Surgery, Haematoma, Obese, Radiation, Tumour

Predicting difficult laryngeal view

Untitled

I’m going to concentrate on the issue of a predicted difficult laryngeal view in more detail, because if we identify a problem here then it’s vital we make a contingency plan prior to pushing the drugs (having said that, one should always make a contingency plan even if the airway is predicted to be easy, particularly in the ED).

The reasons for difficult laryngeal views are due to an inability to line up the three axes of the airway (laryngeal axis, pharyngeal axis and oral axis) with the line of our vision.

Predictors for difficult laryngeal view includes:

  1. Mallampati grade III or IV
  2. Buck teeth/awkward dentitian
  3. Limited mandibular protrusion/Retrognathia
  4. Short/fat neck = Thyromental distance < 6.5cm
  5. Reduced neck movements (particularly extension) or C-spine immobility.

If you highlight any of these then I recommend that you alert the anaesthetic team, and insist on senior airway supervision for the RSI. I also highly recommend that the primary intubator’s first line laryngoscope blade should be a video laryngoscope. DAS guidelines for RSI suggest that you should have NO more than 3 laryngoscope attempts; therefore, make your first attempt your best attempt!

Unconscious patient?

A landmark paper on ED RSI from Fogg et al in 2012, found that the significant majority (65.4%) are carried out due to patients having low conscious states (GCS <8)3.

Levitan et al (2004) published a retrospective study looking at airway assessments in ED RSI’s, which found that ‘Mallampati scoring, neck mobility testing, and measurement of thyromental distance could have been done in only one third of non-cardiac arrest ED intubations and in none of the rapid sequence intubation failures’5.

This is often the reason given for not formally carrying out an assessment (i.e. patient unable to comply with assessment); however, this is an unacceptable excuse as the majority of airway assessment tests can be performed without patient co-operation. All that’s required, is a modified approach.

To do so, put a pair of gloves on and simply look and feel your way through the assessments; short, fat neck, receding mandible, open mouth and inspect dentition, mobilise the neck (provided no risk of C-spine injury). In my opinion the only one that you definitely can’t do is the Mallampati assessment and I have already explained that it’s fairly poor at identifying the difficult intubation if used as the only method of airway assessment.

Ultimately, if you feel you are unable to perform an adequate airway assessment then the patient should be classed as a predicted difficult airway, and the airway plan should reflect that.

Final thoughts and recommendations

Airway assessment is the cornerstone to preparing for your ED RSI. There is NO excuse for its omission. ‘Failure to assess the airway is a failure in professional duty’.

There is always time to perform an airway assessment.

If a potential difficult airway is identified, ensure you have senior airway support.

Obtain immediate feedback from your own airway assessment even if you aren’t the primary intubator. Guess the suspected Cormack and Lehane grade and see if you were correct in suspecting an easy or difficult view.

Have a low threshold for use of a video laryngoscope with the proviso that you are familiar with the device available in your hospital. If you aren’t, then go and practice. Introduce yourself to a friendly anaesthetic colleague and ask to practice in the calm environment of elective theatre. We will always be eager to teach, as we know that airway management transcends specialty boundaries.

Appendix

Wilson’s score

0 1 2
Weight (kg) 90 90-110 >110
Neck movement >90 90 <90
Jaw movement >0 0 <0
Receding mandible None Moderate Severe
Buck teeth None Moderate Severe

Total score <5  easy intubation, 5-7moderate intubation, >7 difficult intubation

LEMON

Look externally – facial trauma, deformity, beard, poor dentition, large tongue etc

Evaluate – 3-3-2 rule of finger breaths. 3 (mouth opening) – 3 (hyoid to chin) – 2 (thyroid to floor of mouth)

Mallampati – (I-IV)

Mallampati1

 

 

 

 


O
bstruction – soft tissue swelling, trauma to the face or neck, foreign bodies, obesity etc.

Neck movements – restricted

References

  1. NAP4 – http://www.rcoa.ac.uk/nap4
  2. Graham C et al. Rapid sequence intubation in Scottish urban emergency departments. EMJ 2003;20:3–5.
  3. Fogg T et al. Prospective observational study of the practice of endotracheal intubation in the emergency department of a tertiary hospital in Sydney, Australia. EMA 2012, 24: 617-624.
  4. Lundstrom L et al. Poor prognostic value of the modified Mallampati score: a meta-analysis involving 177 088 patients. BJA. 107 (5)
  5. Levitan R et al. Limitations of difficult airway prediction in patients intubated in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2004;44:307-13.

 

Filed Under: Pondering Airway Tagged With: Airway, airway assessment, anaesthetics, Mallampati, RSI

Authors

  • Adam Walker
  • Andrew Wilkinson
  • John Gilbert
  • Pondering EM

Comments

  1. Alexei Ortiz Milan says

    January 16, 2018 at 12:54 pm

    May i use the image of Mallampati test which appear in this website in a book about mechanical ventilation that i am writing?
    Thanks!!

    Reply
    • Pondering EM says

      January 16, 2018 at 8:29 pm

      Of course!

      Thanks for reading.

      Reply
  2. Alexei Ortiz Milan says

    April 17, 2018 at 2:03 pm

    May I use as well in the book in the book I’m writing the image which appear here which illustrate the alignment of the oral, pharyngeal and laryngeal axises. Thank

    Reply

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

Follow Ponder Med

Search

Twitter Feed

Tweets by @PonderingEM

Tags

Airway Anders Ericsson Aviation Black Box Thinking Clinical Entrepreneur Programme Closed Loop Communication Comedy communication COVID COVID 19 Deliberate Practice digital health ECG EM Emergency Medicine Emergency Medicine Journal EMJ EMJ Blog healthcare Human Factors Jake Jimmy Kimmel Live Jocko Willink Khayelitsha Hospital mental toughness Metacognition Mindset MRCEM MRCEM Part A Peak performance psychology Pilots Podcast PonderMed Project Wingman Purposeful Practice Readback resilience RSI sim Simulation Situational awareness stress inoculation Trauma UCLA

Archives

  • October 2024 (1)
  • June 2024 (1)
  • September 2023 (1)
  • November 2022 (1)
  • October 2022 (1)
  • October 2020 (1)
  • July 2020 (2)
  • June 2020 (7)
  • May 2020 (7)
  • April 2020 (2)
  • December 2019 (1)
  • December 2018 (2)
  • November 2018 (5)
  • October 2018 (4)
  • April 2018 (1)
  • March 2018 (1)
  • February 2018 (1)
  • January 2018 (2)
  • November 2017 (2)
  • October 2017 (1)
  • August 2017 (2)
  • July 2017 (1)
  • June 2017 (1)
  • May 2017 (2)
  • April 2017 (1)
  • March 2017 (2)
  • February 2017 (1)
  • January 2017 (2)
  • December 2016 (2)
  • November 2016 (2)
  • October 2016 (3)
  • September 2016 (2)
  • August 2016 (1)
  • July 2016 (2)
  • May 2016 (3)
  • April 2016 (1)
  • March 2016 (1)
  • February 2016 (3)
  • January 2016 (2)
  • September 2015 (2)
  • August 2015 (2)
  • July 2015 (3)
  • May 2015 (2)
  • April 2015 (1)
  • March 2015 (2)
  • January 2015 (1)
  • October 2014 (1)
  • September 2014 (1)
  • August 2014 (2)
  • June 2014 (2)

Categories

Cases EMJ Blogs Jake Journal Club Monthly update MRCEM Exams Performance Podcasts Pondering Airway Pondering Cardiology Pondering Paeds Pondering Tox Pondering Trauma Uncategorised

Hi everybody. This is now my OLD BLOG SITE. I have moved over to Substack. I’m keeping this space alive so you can still access everything I’ve posted to date on here… but all my new content (along with everything over here) has been moved over. See you over there. Please consider subscribing to my […]

Disclaimers:

Patient confidentiality will never be breached, and the details of cases discussed will be modified appropriately. The views/opinions on this blog are very much my own, and do not reflect the views of our employers. The content of this blog is not medical advice.

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in